Skip to content
PhytoTesterRequest a Demo
RESEARCH & EVIDENCE

Evidence first. Claims second.

PhytoTester has been developed through research, prototyping and field testing. This page separates what is supported from what should not be inferred from a single measurement.

PUBLISHED & FIELD EVIDENCE

What supports the current product story

The strongest claims on this site are tied to published research and documented field testing.

AGROSYM 2023

5–10 second, non-destructive assessment

Published research presented at AGROSYM 2023 reports that the technology can be used to assess the physiological condition of plant material in approximately 5–10 seconds without damaging the tested material.

Open published source (PDF) ↗
DENMARK

Testing in real production environments

PhytoTester has also been tested in Denmark with farmers, greenhouse operations and agribusiness representatives, alongside testing in production environments.

Open programme source (PDF) ↗
SUPPORTED

What the measurement can support

  • Direct measurement of plant bioelectrical signals
  • Physiological-condition and vitality assessment
  • Plant and sample comparison when records are kept in context
NOT A STANDALONE CLAIM

What should not be concluded by the device alone

  • Complete planting-material quality
  • Varietal quality
  • Phytosanitary status

Results can be considered alongside field observations, agronomic knowledge and other relevant assessment methods.

WHY THIS BOUNDARY MATTERS

Credibility comes from saying exactly what the data means

PhytoTester is positioned as an additional plant-level measurement input. The value is stronger when the result is interpreted in its field context rather than presented as a universal diagnosis.

SEE THE METHOD

Watch the measurement process, not just the claim

In a demo, we can show the device, plant measurement workflow, mobile recording and digital review layer.

Request a Demo